The Centech 60794 Obd2 Scanner, a popular choice among DIY car enthusiasts, offers a range of features at an affordable price point. This review explores some firsthand experiences with the device, highlighting both its strengths and potential drawbacks. We’ll delve into specific issues encountered, compare it to other options, and ultimately seek input from other users.
Initial Impressions and Functionality
Purchased with a 25% off coupon, the Centech 60794 seemed like a great deal compared to other OBD2 scanners, especially considering its ABS support – a crucial deciding factor over competing models. Initial use involved basic data capture and code reading on a 2002 Impala and a 2011 Equinox. The scanner boasts the ability to store three separate data captures before overwriting. However, inconsistencies emerged during usage.
Data Capture Quirks and Concerns
One peculiarity observed was the inconsistent data storage. While the Centech 60794 displays three distinct data captures on the vehicle’s OBD port, only two unique sets appear when reviewing the data indoors, unplugged from the car. Returning to the vehicle and plugging the scanner back in reveals all three original data sets. This unusual behavior raises questions about the reliability of the data logging feature. Furthermore, the number of data points captured fluctuated unexpectedly, jumping from 54 to 59 on the Impala without any apparent reason.
Operational Inconsistencies
Another issue encountered involved the “Manual Trigger” function for complete data sets. While initially requiring a manual key press to initiate data collection, the scanner began automatically starting the process, even after clearing the Check Engine Light (CEL). This unexpected behavior, despite settings configured to trigger only on a CEL, adds to the list of operational inconsistencies.
Screen Readability and Comparisons
Beyond data capture, a minor yet noticeable inconvenience is the poor screen readability when the device is unplugged. The illumination significantly diminishes, making it difficult to review data indoors. This contrasts sharply with the vibrant display when connected to the vehicle’s OBD port. Prior experience with a simpler, albeit less feature-rich, Actron code reader highlighted the robust reliability of older models. The Actron, while lacking CAN capabilities for newer vehicles like the Equinox, provided consistent and dependable code reading functionality. The decision to opt for the Centech 60794 over a laptop-based solution stemmed from concerns about connectivity issues with certain ScanTool hardware, particularly the MX tool.
Conclusion: Seeking User Feedback
The Centech 60794 OBD2 scanner offers a compelling feature set at an attractive price. However, the encountered data inconsistencies, operational quirks, and diminished screen readability raise concerns about its overall reliability. While the scanner’s rugged build inspires confidence, its performance in comparison to older, simpler code readers and more advanced laptop-based solutions remains questionable. Do you have experience with the Centech 60794 OBD2 scanner? Share your thoughts and insights in the comments below. Your feedback can help potential buyers make informed decisions and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of this device’s strengths and weaknesses.
